Beliefs in the sanctity of life Essay

Explain how beliefs in sanctitude of livingspan whitethorn influence ethical approaches to stillbirth This issue involves the principles associated with miscarriage and involves the consideration of the act of killing and the ethical questions that this raises. The belief that emotional state is in some way sacred or holy is widely support throughout several different cultures and religions, and is traditionally understood as cosmos given by God. Believers in the Sanctity of Life take a deontological position in which love and compassion for all human life has a significant role in their everyday lives. The sanctitude of life argument is often put forward from a Christian viewpoint, and is overly supported in the Roman Catholic church. The Church of England also combines opposite word to abortion with recognition that there can be strictly hold conditions in which it is object lessonly satisfying to carry out an abortion. Members of this Church donation the Roman Cathol ic view that abortion is gravely contrary to the moral law, suggesting that life is precious and reinforcing their belief in the holiness of life. The Church says that human life begins when the womans egg is fertilised by a male sperm. From that moment a unique life begins, independent of the life of the bewilder and father. The features that distinguish us from our p arnts the colour of our eyes, the shape of our face are all laid down in the genetic code that comes into universe of discourse then.Each new life that begins at this point is not a potency human beingness but a human being with potential, therefore abortion is wrong, because life is precious and created in Gods image. Kant gives the idea of the sanctity of life a non-religious perspective based on ethical grounds. He considers each human life sacred, and said that everyone has potential to have a good life, therefore against abortion as he believes life starts from conception. Abortion cannot be justified in K antian ethical motive if it simply concerns itself because the foetus has intrinsic value based upon the principle of the sanctity of life. However Singer argues from both sides, and says To kill a human gravid is murder, and is unhesitatingly and universally condemned. Yet there is no obvious nappy line which marks the zygote from the adult. Hence the problem.By recognising the problem of abortion and when a foetus becomes a person, in which killing it is punishable, Singer considers the fond moral grounds of killing and the ethical questions it raises. Therefore by not coming to a full conclusion, we see that not all state have an absolute view on the sanctityof life in relation to abortion. Some relativists say that they are neither pro-life nor pro-choice, and it depends totally on the circumstance. For example, if giving birth to a baby would put the mothers life at risk, then an abortion would be acceptable because it could be argued that a foetus is not a person and that the sanctity of the mothers life is greater than the foetus, meaning that they may interpret the terms life and unborn differently. Whilst looking at these cardinal interpretations, the sanctity of different stages of life are brought into consideration.