Essay --

When we analyze a work, it is easy to judge the characters by the standards of our time, but this is non very fair to them. They do not dramatise our rules they follow the standards of their societies. In addition, unless the characters thoughts are revealed to us in soliloquies or asides, we cannot reveal if the person knows of his or her actions consequences. To determine if a character is skillful or bad, we moldiness set a standard and evaluate it for each text edition we examine. We shall define goodness as performing actions whose outcomes are net positive, mean or not, and badness as the opposite. Through this lens we shall examine mogul Claudius of Hamlet, discovering that while Claudius might be a good King, he is emphatically not a good person.When we first meet Claudius, he is dimension court and giving a very long and eloquent linguistic process with frequent use of the royal we. He begins by unifying himself with the sense of hearing in grief over our dear bro thers goal (1.2.1) and then explains he go out marry Queen Gertrude to both change integrity his rule and bring mirth to funeral (1.2.12). However, it is odd that King Hamlets son, Hamlet, did not inherit the throne. Claudius explains, referring to his near marriage, that the nobles have freely gone / With this social occasion along (1.2.15-6), so it is likely that he convinced the nobles to vote for him as King instead of Hamlet, who was away. Instead of taking the crown by force, which Laertes and Fortinbras will later attempt, Claudius became King without any harm whatsoever, excepting the murder of King Hamlet. His facility with the royal court and the trust he places in the nobles are signs of his good Kingship, however much hidden blood there may be.Claudius is not just friendly with the nobles. ... ...m the poisoned goblet makes Hamlet realize Claudiuss visualize and results in Hamlet killing him with the same goblet.Although we quickly see through and through Claudius s sham, his bad qualities might be the reason for his good Kingship. after all, a King who is ambitious, manipulative, and selfish would want to keep the throne, and since Claudius dislikes confrontation, he has plainly decided to remain in power by being a just and wise ruler. He might have had the wrong motivations and a terrible character, but royal policies were, on the whole, good for Denmark. But we must not forget his terrible choice instead of giving up his sins rewards, he chooses to keep them and kill Hamlet to assure his crown. Make no mistake, Claudius was a bad person, but Denmark had experienced an extraordinary King, ended with poisoned pledge in his throat and poisoned sword in his chest.