Ethics of Civil Disobedience Essay -- Ethics Morals Philosophy Rationa

Ethics of Civil DisobedienceBan animal inclemency Give aid to the poor Save the rainforests Obey the fairness As a human race we must strive to fulfill these commands, for they argon our moral duties and obligations. Our obligation to morality sometimes leads to a dilemma. What happens when a law contradicts the morally right thing to do? Would it be moral to coif illegally by ravishing the law? No matter how drastic the measure, we are still required to practice morally-- level if whiz must break the law to do so. But why is it so important to be moral that sensation could justify something as serious as gap the law?If morality is so signifi basint that one could justify open frame the law we must consider the importance of being moral in the first place. The question Why be moral? is difficult for umteen philosophers to answer. Just by our attempt to answer this question we would already be displaying the need to act morally. This is more clearly seen with the difficulty is asking a similar type of question, Why act rationally? According to vocalizer many philosophers reject the question Why act morally? because it is tally to this question of performing rationally. It would take rationality to explain why one should act rationally. Thus defeating the need to explain the importance of rationality in the first place. it needs no justification, because it cannot be intelligibly questioned unless it is already presupposed (Singer 316). besides why be moral? asks for a moral reason to act morally.Modern Kantianism considers acting rationally to be the identical as acting ethically. If this is true, one could rationalize a need that is in their own self interest, yet at the same time against the interest of another individual. Since this c... ... is the unless means of preventing greater strength would be responsible for the greater violence they fail to prevent (Singer 307). Pacifism can be seen in the same way as the omission approach to euthan asia. Although you are not straightaway killing, by refusing to step in you are allowing to die. Since the ends can justify the means, even something as radical as violently breaking the law can be the moral thing to do.Above all we desire a meaning to life. We can find meaning by acting morally. Therefore, one is not obligated to obey a law that contradicts morality. After all, it would be morally wrong of the government to deny anyone meaning in life. plant life Cited * Singer, Peter. Practical Ethics, 2nd edition. 1993. Cambridge Cambridge University Press * Rachels, James. The Elements of Moral Philosophy, Fourth Edition. McGraw Hill, New York, 2003.