Darkness at Noon Revision Notes Essay

Why does Nikolai Rubashov witness to crimes against the rotation that he has non committed? What be the political options open to Rubashov following his concord? Which option does he choose? atomic number 18 the implications of the political argument in Arthur Koesters swarthiness at twelve noon anti- whirlingary or merely anti-Stalinist? Is Darkness at Noon an attempt to explain why the Russian Revolution in particular failed or is it an attempt to explain why all(prenominal) diversitys that rely on violent mode to achieve their odditys must fail? What is the primaeval political argument of Arthur Koestlers Darkness at Noon? What atomic number 18 the political implications of his argument? Outline the most of the essence(predicate) differences in the political mentality of Rubashovs interrogators- Ivanov and Gletkin?What political options are open to Rubashov aft(prenominal) he is concorded? Following Rubashovs arrest Ivanov gave the option of going through a publi c trial by confessing to certain acts, or having a private administrative trial. Public trial* This could lead to the discrediting and debilitative of the political orientation * Rubashov held a high send within the party, and for him to be seen as a dissident would defend stirred other(a) revolutionaries * Would have made it more(prenominal) intemperate for the party to discredit his views if Rubashov did non in public denounce himself * Doesnt serve the revolution* Preserves his own esteem in some ways only if is of no use to the greater adept admit * Rubashov capitulates in order to serve the revolution and the party * Although he was non discredited of anything, he cannot find any actor in his own mind not to capitulate. Rubashov has been a creature of the party for his entirely life, and now the party demands that he should confess * Justice and objective truth have ceased to have any meaning for him * He feels superior to his Czarist officer who inhabits the close cell, showing the differences in thought processes from a person ingrained with the party political theory versus the bourgeois angle who would uphold his comply* The officer believes that honour is somewhat doing what you study is right, an individualisticist perspective, where as Rubashov contends that to uphold the honour of the regime/revolution is more honourable. ideology dictates the actions of all players in the regime citizen and say To serve the revolution, Rubashov finds it necessary to capitulate serves the greater good it is better to confess to crimes not committed than to risk the reputation of the revolution for his own honour grammatical simile there is no I. This is a manifestation of the corruption of revolutions enacted through violent meat. The means dont justify the ends when the citizens are being overlooked the revolution is speculate to act for the good of the people, but the ideology has become corrupted to serve the good of itself and its leader. Outline the most important differences in the political mentality of Rubashovs interrogators- Ivanov and Gletkin?Ivanov * He lived before the revolution, and was an intellectual who helped bring about and serve the revolution * He is not a man of violence would select to persuade Rubashov rather than circle him. compulsion is a last resort for him, but if it is necessary, he believes that the ends do justify the means.Gletkin * Gletkin is of the entropy generation of the revolution. He comes from a grump background, is not an intellectual. Rubashov thinks of him as little more than a violent thug. * His political views are therefore those of the party, he accepts what is force feed to him without thinking critically about it. * He is a man of violence. He wants to beat and torture Rubashov to obtain his confession. Therefore he doesnt believe in the bringing close together of persuasion. However this does show that he believes the end justifies the means. * Gletk in is the culmination of what Koestler argues went wrong with the revolution he represents totalitarian thought, and he is the kind of individual that it produces. * born without an umbilical cord