Occupy Wall Street Movement

Krystal Graham rest circumvent lane Business incorruptity Professor Steven Curry pertain beleaguer Street The occupy W altogether Street run has beget a big deal since it began in the fall of 2011. This movement was inspired by internationalistic protests, with thousands arriving in impertinently York City answering the call, soon spreading to well all oer calciferol cities. I would like to discuss more of the details of the movement, the moral and sparing implications, as well as the different ethics theories to see which possibility best applies to the movement.The Arab Springs protest on February 11, 2011 was the most non equal to(p) inspiration of the Occupy protect Street movement. According to the website charter together, the operate movement is an international movement driven by single(a)s. They atomic number 18 organized in over 100 cities in the United States, and they aim to fight back against the carcass that has allowed the rich to get richer and t he poor to get poorer. All of us put one across many different backgrounds and political beliefs tho feel that, since we send word no longer trust our elected officials to represent anyone other than their wealthinessiest donors, we need actually tidy sum to create real change from the bottom up We no longer call for the wealthiest to hold all the agency, to write the rules governing an nauseous and in upright global economy, and thus foreclosing on our future. The movement works to carry bring out their goals by resist, In the spirit and tradition of civil disobedience occupy takes to the streets to protest corporate greed, abuse of power, and growing economic disparity Restructure, occupy empowers individuals to lead others into action by gathering in the commons as engaged citizens to demonstrate a culture based on confederation and mutual aid. We leave behind be the change we argon seeking in the world and finally, Remix work to make fundamental changes in the syste m.Now that we know a little more about the movement itself, let us waitress at some of the moral and economic implications of this movement. In the Constitution, the Fourteenth Amendment assumes that the brass provide equal protection of the laws to all citizens. The moral implications of the Occupy Wall Street movement reach far beyond the passing whiz it has created. The movement seems to be acquiring immunity from the laws the rest of us argon expected to obey by calling themselves representatives of the 99 percent against the 1 percent.If 99 percent of the hoi polloi in the country were like the Occupy mobs we would have anarchy, non a country. Democracy means majority rule, non mob rule, and if Occupy or any other mob movement actually represents the majority, they would have enough votes to legally achieve what they are toilsome to accomplish by illegal means. In problems of corporal action, individuals who work just for their own selfish interests can bring about t ragic consequences for nine as a whole. The only carriage for collective action problems to be solved is to create coordinated collaborations that unite social and individual interests.The collective element is paramount because even one defector (someone who acts selfishly, like those who tie accused of criminal acts at Occupy Wall Street camps) has the power to run e realthing by leading others to defect as well. I plant an example of the Occupy movement being about the law on the national review website. When trespassers blocking other population at the University of California-Davis refused to split up and locked their arms with one another to prevent the police from being able to physically remove them, police finally resorted to pepper spray to reach up this human logjam.The result? The police have been strongly criticized for enforcing the law. apparently pepper spray is unpleasant, and people who break the law are not supposed to have unpleasant things done to them. Which is to say, we need to take the enforcement out of law enforcement. The police are the last line of defense against barbarism, but they are equipped only to handle that minority who are not stopped by the first line of defense, moral principles. If everyone takes the path of least resistance, then the moral fundament volition corrode and crumble.The moral infrastructure is one of the intangibles without which the tangibles dont work. Like the physical infrastructure, its neglect in the short run invites disaster in the long run. Examples of real, measurable Occupy inspired change in the political sphere are tight to come by, though a band of millionaires did storm Capital pitcher on Wednesday November 16, match to an article by the Associated Press to urge relative to tax them more, claiming they are not paying their fair share. The financial crisis caused a deep recession in our economy, and there are many individuals who are struggling to make ends meet and to get a job and to endure their lives given the economic difficulties. I think there is an understandable thwarting with the difficult economic circumstances that many families are experiencing now and a desire for change. There is one cost associated with Occupy Wall Street that is readily available, and that is the cost incurred by police as they patrolled the movement, originally in a watchdog status, and eventually as they cleared protestors from parks passim the country.According to the Associated Press, as of November 24, taxpayers had paid at least $13 million in police overtime and municipal services. This includes $7 million in clean York and $2. 4 million in Oakland, which faces a budget gap of $58 million this year. Utilitarianism is the moral doctrine that we should always act to produce the great possible balance of good over bad for everyone affected by our actions. The interests of the community are simply the sum of the interest of its members. An action promotes the inter ests of an individual when it adds to the individuals pleasure or diminishes the persons spite.There are six points that need to be considered about utilitarianism. First, when deciding which action will produce the greatest happiness, we must consider unhappiness or pain as well happiness. Second, actions affect people to different degrees. Third, because utilitarians evaluate actions according to their consequences and because actions produce different results in different circumstances, almost anything might in principle, be morally chastise in some particular situation. Fourth, utilitarians appetite to maximize happiness not simply immediately but in the long run as well.Fifth, utilitarians acknowledge that we often do not know with certainty what the future consequences of our actions will be. Finally, when choosing among possible actions, utilitarianism does not require us to disregard our own pleasure, nor should we give it added weight. Immanuel Kant sought moral principl es that do not rest on contingencies and that define actions as inherently right or wrong apart from any particular circumstances. He believed that moral rules can, in principle, be known as a result of drive lone and are not based on observation. Kantian possibility uses the categorical imperative which says that we can will the maxim of our action to become a universal law. By maxim, Kant meant the subjective principle of an action, the principle that people in effect formulate in determining their conduct. Another way of looking at the categorical imperative is universal acceptability. Each person, through and through his or her own acts of will, legislates the moral law. Because reason is the same for all lucid beings, we all give ourselves the same moral law.In other words, when you answer the move What should I do? you must consider what all rational beings should do. You can embrace something as a moral law only if all other rational beings can also embrace it. It must ha ve universal acceptability. In addition to the principle of universal acceptability, Kant explicitly offered another, very famous way of formulating the core idea of his categorical imperative. According to this formulation, as rational creatures we should always treat other rational creatures as ends in themselves and never as only means to our ends.Virtue ethics is identified as the one that emphasizes the virtues, or moral character, in contrast to the approach which emphasizes duties or rules or that which emphasizes the consequences of actions. Out of the theories, utilitarian, Kantian, and virtue ethics, I believe the Occupy Wall Street movement tries to follow the utilitarian theory. The movement is attempting to end the blood built on money and donations between our elected officials and corporate interests.They want a system that operates in the interest of the people and to empower people to be a part of the process. They say they represent the 99 percent, and act to mak e a change to have equal distribution of wealth for the country, which is what they feel is the best interest of the country as a whole. The income dissimilitude and unequal wealth distribution in the United States is something that has been building over time and is not really any one person or companies spot. Many of the wealthy have earned the money by workings hard to get to where they are now.There are many issues involved in the wealth distribution in our country, including that many of the poor have gotten poorer collectable to the lack of jobs as well as the fact that many of the owe companies allowed people to get into more debt by handing out home loans to people who wanted to purchase homes way out of their price ranges. This is also the fault of the people who got themselves into those positions. I am not sure if there is an equitable outcome from this movement, but I am sure this movement will continue, and if not, there will be another movement similar to this one .