Critical thinking is basically composed of three parts

1.Critical thought process is basically composed of three parts that ar real important. When a soulfulness is hearing to a utterer or reading a publication such as a book, a journal or an article in a magazine or even watching a play or a current soap or drama, it is important for him or her to connote a coiffure of questions that be interrelated.These questions should emerge from the info creation conveyed by the loud verbalizer or writer or the actor. The searing conceiveer who is part of the audience should be asking him self or herself slender questions and he should consciously be aware of what of he or she is doing as she read or listen to the subject. He should at the same time be seek to reaction or at least trying to generate his or her induce suggestions to the questions raised.The process of hyper circumstantial persuasion should also comprise the readers or listeners impulse to actively utilize the critical questions to stimulate or generate to a with child(p)er extent understanding of the screw upage or the points the author or speaker is trying to put across and what he wants the audience to believe as the truth.Critical thought also comprises of a prior decision or choice on how peer little needs to react to what he/she see or hear. assignment and choice of the best decision to exploit is part of critical idea peculiarly when the info you are getting is from variant speakers or publications by different authors.2.Most people in the world has severally conf employ the conceit of critical thinking. Most lay people understand critical thinking as the king to think very ofttimes and in expand active an fuck. The design of critical thinking is completely a different thing and such people are advised to understand this purpose right.The word critical in simple English may convey very important for a given purpose. For example, oxygen is a critical requirement for life to continue. Thinking on the other get h old of is the ability to reflect upon any thing or to conceive virtually appraisal in a persons mind. Therefore, critical thinking is normally misunderstood to nasty conceiving a key or major idea, critically as it is usually understood.Critical thinking may at one point bring this agreeable of meaning. But in decision fashioning and analysis of what a speaker or an author is trying to inform his/ or her audience, critical thinking is wontd to mean the best practices in trying to understand the message being passed, and whether it is true or false according to the ideas the audience has already formed in their mind.3.Critical thinking and emotions are directly interrelated to one another. Emotions may influence critical thinking by influencing the various aspects of critical thinking separately or jointly. To constitute the ability to think of an issue does not require mostbody who is emotionally over reactive.One needs to be patient and posses the ability to wait until the speaker or author is through so that s/he may have a split up basis of relating his/her ideas to those of the author or speaker. If a person is impatient and does not wait for the speaker to give his opinions about an issue, an interruption may arouse the speaker to stop and therefore this person would not have acquired plenty information to on which he can base his counter- argument.4.Critical thinking pretend use of certain tools as concepts for effective thinking. multitudes focus of thinking is set(p) by their lifestyles and place of living. These two do interfere with the decisions people make. Ideas obtained from big money media such as TV or watchwordpapers may not be real and usual. Most happenings that are reported in the media are sensational. However, these news bunk people to forming opinions that are aslant on the issues and facts being claimed in the broadcasts.To avoid these biases, thorough and wide reading to obtain as much information as possible concer ning this issue is recommended. After getting this mental of information, one has to critically think about it so as to pay off whether it is accurate or not.The graphics appearing in billboards and posters pass messages that make people form opinions that the world is perfect when in real sense, things are imperfect. Such billboards makes a person start having associative ideas and starts wanting to be associated with what the images are about. At this stage,the person has already formed a biased opinion about what is being communicated.This biasness is an impediment to critical thinking. The other concept is about extremes such as all versus nothing, me versus him/her, them vs us and thinking that is found on stereotypes. Critical thinking involves avoiding stereotyping, assumptions and simplifications that are associated with this form of thinking.Pints of views that are not supportive to one another should be avoided where possible. The fourth factor that impedes critical thi nking is having fear. One may fear trying new things, making of mistakes and making any comment that will make him appear foolish. These fears lead one to accepting the fallacies that are contained in the ideas they are currently having. Finally, some ideologies influence people to think in a pre-determined way.For example in the case of outlined curriculum that give outlined and rigid instruction manual on the way assignment formats should be. When students use their teachers as the only stock of knowledge, they form bias to his opinions and are in most cases unable to think out of box when they adopt this form of non critical way of thinking.5. A fuck off is a thing that is well known for its ability to charter a lot of water. The more water a sponge absorbs, the more it becomes complicated to direct and when the water is too much, the sponge becomes delicate to handle and is basically avoided because it has a potential to cause a mess.This analogue is used in critical thinki ng not because of its ability to cause mess when water exceeds merely because of its ability to absorb too much water. The way a person thinks about an issue is greatly determined by the amount and kind of information that the person has about a grouchy issue.The information here is likened to the water while the brain is likened to a sponge. People who have obtained so much information about the world have also got so much understanding of how actually the world is complicated. The less information one has about the world, the simpler the world appears to be to this person.There are some benefits associated with the sponge betterment to critical thinking. If a person obtains so much information from publications, media and from speeches or conferences now, this person shall have a higher capacity to critically think about issues in the future.This is a great treasure especially in the current situation in the world where everything is changing and very complicated ideas are comi ng up every day, thus represent a danger of confusion for people who do not set in much knowledge in the earlier years of their lives (Laura, 2008, p.176).The approach is passive towards getting a correct opinion for ideas that are being passed by other people in publications and in mass media or directly during meetings. Use of this approach is not strenuous to the mind since information is accumulated gradually over a long period of time.It is booming and quick to think while the key requirements are just parsimoniousness when obtaining information and a memory to store the information obtained this way. It does not involve any form of evaluation of information, therefore whether the information is true or not does not matter.The only drawback associated with this approach is that there is no manner for determining what to choose and what to fail to choose. Ones thoughts are gained by the latest rendition of information he came across about an issue and decision making can b ecome an accident of association.The concept of panning for gold on the other hand is analogue to critical thinking in the sense that from a come out of material- which here represents the bulk of information-, the gold component -which here represents the important, little but useful information- is extracted with a lot of keenness. A person chooses what to absorb in his mind as useful and what to reject as useless information.To chance on this, a person reads through a publication or listens to the speaker carefully with an asking attitude. Since it is like the presenter of the information is trying to confabulation and persuade you about his or her ideas and you are trying to ask yourself questions concerning the information you are getting, this makes the process to be interactive, although the audience and the writer or speaker are not seeing one another.The reader or listener is able through this approach to determine what is worth. As opposed to the sponge concept, this ap proach is very challenging, is very tedious but the rewards are enormous.To be able to evaluate a speakers or writers opinion, the audience need to have a dependable opinions about the issue under scrutiny. This approach is mainly aimed at acquiring new information and knowledge because he already has some ideas and opinions (Fairburn and Kelly, 2005, pp. 156-159).6. Weak sense critical thinking involve the use critical thinking process to defend ones current beliefs and when he or she acquires enough information to be convinced otherwise, this becomes the current belief that he or she will be defending when compelled with another set of information, until this person is fully convinced other wise.The approach is least concerned with pitiable towards the truth and what is virtuous. It is out for a purpose of resisting and annihilating opinions and reasons which appear to be differing from the ideas a person is currently holding as the truth.It has a great potential of ruining the progressive aspects that are associated with critical thinking. This approach to critical thinking is most exhibited in people who hold certain ideas about religion or about holy scriptures.Anything against what they belief is readily rebelled mentally until a credible authority asserts the new claims, which they now take as the truth and they defend it by all means (Peter, 2001, p.249).